Skip to content

a community of recovery-oriented experts

  • Home
  • About
  • Contributors
  • Fair Use

Category: Controversies

Response to Why Addiction is NOT a Brain Disease

January 20, 2022February 28, 2022 ~ Jason Schwartz

This post was originally published in 2012 and is part of an ongoing review of past posts about the conceptual boundaries of addiction and its relationship to the disease model and recovery. In a thoughtful post, Marc Lewis questions the disease model of addiction. He doesn't dismiss it out of hand. He seems to look … Continue reading Response to Why Addiction is NOT a Brain Disease

Recovery MAINTENANCE

October 21, 2020February 28, 2022 ~ Jason Schwartz ~ 4 Comments

This post was originally published in 2014. There's a lot of commentary out there on Philip Seymour Hoffman's death. Some of it's good, some is bad and there's a lot in between. Much of it has focused overdose prevention and some of it has focused on a need for evidence-based treatments. Anna David puts her … Continue reading Recovery MAINTENANCE

…let us work together

June 14, 2015February 28, 2022 ~ Jason Schwartz ~ 2 Comments

The last couple of days' posts, a recent conversation and some recent news (I'll let you guess which story.) reminded me of this post. It's from a couple of years ago and has a couple of minor updates.   "If you have come here to help me, then you are wasting your time…  But if … Continue reading …let us work together

The adjacent possible and hope

May 23, 2015February 28, 2022 ~ Jason Schwartz ~ 2 Comments

I heard a radio show this morning about where ideas come from. They interviewed a guy who wrote a book and gave a TED talk on the topic. During the interview he discussed the concept of the adjacent possible and it's importance in forming new ideas. During the interview, he described it as the building … Continue reading The adjacent possible and hope

2014’s top posts: #2

January 1, 2015February 28, 2022 ~ Jason Schwartz ~ 6 Comments

"He'd still be alive" Much has been said this week about the death of Phillip Seymour Hoffman. I've heard two recurring themes. First, that he might still be alive if he had been "treated with an evidence-based" treatment, like buprenorphine. Second, that he might still be alive if he hadn't been inculcated with the disease … Continue reading 2014’s top posts: #2

2014’s Top Posts: #3

December 31, 2014February 28, 2022 ~ Jason Schwartz

Recovery MAINTENANCE There's a lot of commentary out there on Philip Seymour Hoffman's death. Some of it's good, some is bad and there's a lot in between. Much of it has focused overdose prevention and some of it has focused on a need for evidence-based treatments. Anna David puts her finger on something very important. … Continue reading 2014’s Top Posts: #3

2014’s top posts: #5

December 29, 2014February 28, 2022 ~ Jason Schwartz ~ 1 Comment

He died from heroin (addiction) Phil Hoffman . . . did not die from an overdose of heroin — he died from heroin. We should stop implying that if he’d just taken the proper amount then everything would have been fine. via Aaron Sorkin: Philip Seymour Hoffman and Drug Addiction

Top posts of 2014: #12

December 21, 2014February 28, 2022 ~ Jason Schwartz ~ 2 Comments

Abstinence—The Only Way to Beat Addiction? What killed Philip Seymour Hoffman? According to Anne Fletcher, it wasn't the doctor who prescribed him the pain medication that began his relapse, it wasn't the prescribers of the combination of meds found in his body, it wasn't his discontinuing the behaviors that maintained his recovery for 23 years, … Continue reading Top posts of 2014: #12

Urban myths exposed

April 23, 2014February 28, 2022 ~ Jason Schwartz ~ 1 Comment

Points blog is back with a great interview with George Vaillant. Here's one of the questions and his response: 2. What do you think a bunch of alcohol and drug historians might find particularly interesting about your book? The value of the Grant study to the history of alcoholism is the number of urban myths that … Continue reading Urban myths exposed

Anti-treatment zombie stats

March 22, 2014February 28, 2022 ~ Jason Schwartz ~ 8 Comments

This 90% statistic has been frequently cited to discredit specialty addiction treatment. Ninety percent of those who enter addiction-treatment programs in the U.S. don’t receive evidence-based treatment I asked David Scheff about it several weeks back. He said it was from RAND and referred me to his book. I looked in his book and couldn't … Continue reading Anti-treatment zombie stats

Posts navigation

Older posts

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 1,613 other subscribers

Follow via social media

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

  • billstaufferpa
  • Brian Coon
  • Chris Budnick
  • Dr David McCartney
  • emilys26
  • Jason Schwartz
  • M. Welch Marahar, MPP
  • A. Brown
  • Shane Phillips

Special series

Recovery Alliance Initiative

2001 Recovery Summit Interviews

Addiction Professionals in the Pandemic

Co-authored by Bill White

Stages of Healing

Building a New Science of Recovery

Recovery-oriented Harm Reduction

A Consumer’s Guide to SUD Research

A Closer Look at the Evidence

Archives

Links

  • William White Papers
  • Recovery Research Institute
  • DrugWise Daily
  • Journal of Recovery Science
  • Keith Humphreys
  • DB Recovery Resources
  • Points Blog
  • IRETA Blog
Blog at WordPress.com.
  • Follow Following
    • recoveryreview.blog
    • Join 390 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • recoveryreview.blog
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...